Saturday, July 15, 2006
AMD X2 at 2Ghz faster than Kentsfield at 2,4Ghz
AMD X2 at 2Ghz is faster than Kentsfield at 2,4Ghz with two cores.
So much about some unbeatable benchmarks on unbeatable Kentsfield processor.
Just as badhardware found somewhat earlier.OK. Now some latest benchmark findings on Conroe.
As you can see from the results, Intel takes a decisive lead in all categories but one: memory bandwidth. In Sandra 2007, Intel lags by astounding 100% when compared to the AMD products.
Just as badhardware found long time ago. Conroe is cache optimized. So when cache miss happens, unbeatable Conroe stalls. The role of Intel's carefully chosen benchmarks is to do just that: best in cache only.
NO CACHE REFERENCES READY AND YOU CAN'T PUSH CONROE CLOCK OVER 1,6GHZ. THIS FRAUD IS WORTH P4 FRAUD GLORY.
SORT OF TURBO OFF REGIME, WITH TURBO BUTTON YOU COULD SEE ONLY AT OLD X86 286 AT PROCESSORS. THOUGH IN CACHE STARVING AUTOMATIC MODE NOW.
ANYONE INTERESTED IN COMMON SUE, AFTER MISLEADING BENCHES ?
This post link