BAD HARDWARE WEEK

The Office of Professional Responsibility, which is the Justice Department's internal ethics unit, had been asked by congressional Democrats in January to review the role that department officials played in the creation and operation of the program that intercepted millions of overseas telephone calls and e-mails originating in the U.S.

The reason? I don't need stinking OPR. What more, in the end, I don't need any ethics at all!
Question for the President: But, terrorists themself don't need ethics too, when they are killing innocent. What is the difference?
By the way, never have been so many terrorists and terrorism BEFORE Mr. Bush arrival in the Oval Office, after hmm quite unethical decision of the Supreme Court on his election victory with overall less number of voters than Presidential candidate from Democratic Party. Some idiot that don't regularly watch TV might say that Bush himself intentionally produced all this mess around. I mean, some 6 years after the 9/11 event, President is still unable to capture or kill Osama !?. But he eliminated all those others who bother Great Israel in any way! Perhaps he wouldn't like to (sp)oil still? warm and friendly relations with Osama's oil family? Or with ZION RING FAMILY? What if Osama is only their's latest negative role character from the Hollywood production sequel?

In my humble opinion, ethics is the basis of all: Our Laws, our society and administration, our religion, and our future. Without it, what will left in the end of all?
Well, seems that some court people who make those stinking orders don't agree with theirs President.
In a setback for the Bush administration's secretive Terrorist Surveillance Program, a federal judge in San Francisco on Thursday denied a government motion to quash a warrantless-wiretapping lawsuit against AT&T.

U.S. Northern District Judge Vaughn R. Walker rejected the government's claim that allowing the suit to proceed would compromise state secrets.

In a 72-page order, which attorneys for the plaintiffs called a victory, Walker wrote that dismissing the case at this early stage ``would sacrifice liberty for no apparent enhancement of security.''

This post link