Thursday, March 16, 2006
No any .NET in Microsoft's new .NET Vista !
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f63/18f632778208a170b0f5ebcc9bec98d05aa575ae" alt=""
Microsoft appears to have concentrated their development effort in Vista on native code development. In contrast to PDC03LH, Vista has no services implemented in .NET and Windows Explorer does not host the runtime, which means that the Vista desktop shell is not based on the .NET runtime. The only conclusion that can be made from these results is that between PDC 2003 and the release of Vista Beta 1 Microsoft has decided that it is better to use native code for the operating system, than to use the .NET framework.
However, requesting some 800MB DRAM for idle run, Vista has some new requests on hardware: There is as a nice remedy with a new Vista hardware rating system that will tell you Will your PC keep pace with Vista?
Luckily, new Intel's architecture (Merom, Conroe, Woodrest) will be ready in time, like it was the case
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55aa4/55aa4da83f84867f4e52cde799f8aff83533c499" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d77b5/d77b5f0273366f107a76da8c567f2f6fb86bbe5f" alt=""
Schizophrenic John Nash, the Nobel laureate, noted that duopolies create production to maximise their profits with each of the firms adjusting to the other's strategy.
Intel and Microsoft plan to maximize their profits again, regardless of The Inq's above story.
http://www.digitimes.com/systems/a20060317A1001.html
Leading notebook vendors slash orders with Intel due to weak demand, say sources.
In addition, the planned year-end launch of Microsoft’s Vista OS is also a concern as consumers are worried that the notebooks they buy now might not be able to run with the 64-bit enabled Vista OS, the sources stated.
This post link