BAD HARDWARE WEEK

After five long years of hiding Pentagon attacks, surveliance video is finally released . We now know that all hiding was actually needed to convinct one of terrorists, so now plot is definetely "proved" and invasion on Iraq is justified, because premature releasing of such a video would only prove internal plot in Pentagon in 2001. Now, all should be finally "convinced". WHY NOT IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11 ? Because on that crucial video you can see that event happened on 9/12. Aliens at work or what? And this perfectly synchronized operation with invisible passenger plane did a group of illiteral islamic terrorists at the intellectual level of cave men, what they are literally even at this moment. Strangely enough, US security company that allowed so many simultaneous airplane hijacks on 9/11 is a leading Zionist US organisation with a decades of word's top security experince in the Middle East intelligence and counter hijacking. And only Israel and some financial and petrol companies inside US had a lot of benefits after 9/11 attacks. Who else? Afganistan? Iraq? Oil dependant countries? Suspiciously enough, Minister of defence remained after all in his chair??? That way he was punished for the first ever hit to Pentagon in history, including all the previous wars?

The most important part of video is sequence 5 seconds after impact, what was censored in first BBC report in March 2002. IT TOOK 5 seconds for explosion flash to reach surveliance camera. In normal video you will not see explosion moment because flash would reach and blind camera before even one sequence (like one above) might be completed. In 5 seconds light flash might reach twice to the distance of Moon and back.But couldn't reach surveilance camera only a few hundreds feets away!!. THUS, REAL PROOF OF PENTAGON ATTACK WOULD BE NO VISIBLE MOMENT OF IMPACT VIDEO. !!! Just like airplane is missing because is passed through yard and the field of camera visibility in less than a half second at the speed of half of speed of sound.This way, it only shows someone's wish to convince court and publicity in its own 9/11 event version.

The most plausible explanation that this shot above is actually a moment of firening missile from Pentagon OUTSIDE (seen at previously sequence as a shadow) and surveilance video is showed in reversed sequence. So, no remnants found outside of building. Yes, white cloud is steam out of missile catapult in that case. Yes, missile should have the wings to fly so low, what is not a problem when it is ignited on time.

By the way, obviously no any part of huge Boeing, bigger that the window of Pentagon, is flying around in the moment of explosion? Just as firefighters found soon after: No remnants. That must be then implosion of Boeing, not explosion, what is impossible. Thus, no airplane there, but a guided multistage missile for breaking Pentagon hardened walls doing first, than making implosion inside building that will suck missile remnants inside building , not to be found by firefighters outside but to be covered in a second by falling department roof, and simulatenously directed explosion of missile's second aerosole charge towards outside for making visual effects for TV nets .But, if someone made in the same moment of fake explosion without trails, a controllable implosion inside the Pentagon building, number of victims would be minimized and the number of "confident" eyewhitnesses maximized. BBC analysis shows 4 impact events, not only one, as we might expect in a 4 seconds time frame, if this video is a real proof of Pentagon attack.By coincidence, airplane "hit" just into the closed part of Pentagon, being under reconstruction !!! Strangely, surveilance camera for reconstruction part is missing??? But it would show hole in the wall and explain everything. However probably reconstructions of Pentagon in Bush time were made without any surveilance, so we can't expect something like that. Or its video is removed because it shows something unwanted? At least, in Pentagon are employed experts for special weapons able to do it, not the housewifes. Experts that know what is the best angle for shoting after shooting, if they want to hide something.
As weapon amateur, I could only guess that it is a prove of explosion of mighty aerosol bomb, that doesn't leave any trail.
Anything from dynamite to compressed air could be used to create an aerosol of the material, or it could be dumped from the air using crop dusters.
Recently it has often been stated that such a bomb would be unlikely to harm more than a few people and hence it would be no more deadly than a conventional bomb.
The aerosol weapons have been suggested as a possible terror weapon in order to create panic in densely populated areas.

Briefly, a lot of panic and TV net visual effects, but minimal number of victims.Deja vue.Similar messages were sent on police teletype networks, though in many cases officers had trouble convincing the public that the story they'd heard was fictional. One man called the Bronx Police Headquarters and stated:"They're bombing New Jersey!""How do you know?" inquired an officer."I heard it on the radio," the voice replied. "Then I went to the roof and I could see the smoke from the bombs, drifting over toward New York. What shall I do?"

Compare that with recently released phone(y) tapes of New York attacks.A frequent Hollywood movie scenario?.Applied for Twins, where were no airplane remnants too (fierce explosion that melted even Twins pillars was blamed, but hijacker passport somehow miraculously survived complete airplane evaporation to prove a plot, because Pentagon attack proofs known to be a long time hmmm ... absent !. White flame you see on "prove video" is actually part of aerosol cloud not yet exploded in the "proved" moment of "impact" of nonexisting airplane. Try to desintegrate Boeing's tail (without atomic weapons used) at such precision, by any mean, under any conditions. In one plane explosion in the air , some 30 years ago, one woman survived in passenger airplane tail, even after it fell from the height od 30000 feets into the ground. Thus, real prove for court claimes on video above can not exist, up to the Doom Day. I don't defend terrorism of any kind, but isn't this obvious kind of state terorism , contiunued in the court? After one fake trial (like this one) was made against one Jew named Dreyfus in 1895 (111 years ago) in Paris, the whole world jumped against, and it is not forgot even today. This time, French Government was guilty again, because they wouldn't like to believe in this funny video.
But, average people were convinced up to such detail that refused and boycotted French cheeses and wines.
I think that all previous prove that Big Brother strikes back. I mean that's why Big Brother had a strong reason to do it. But where is the motif? It was publicly announced when it was thought that things where done properly: Republicans (actually Big Brother society) will rule the USA (and the rest of World, but Middle East primarily, by decades !!!! However, something got screwed up later, so that splendid plan(e) was quietly retracted. At this moment Big Brother has public approval less than 30%.
This post link