Sunday, July 16, 2006

Being unable to make a radical architecture improvement , Intel changed the way we see it !

If your eyes follow the movement of the rotating pink dot, you will only see one color, pink. If you stare at the black + in the center, the moving dot turns to green. Now, concentrate on the black + in the center of the picture. After a short period of time, all the pink dots will slowly disappear, and you will only see a green dot rotating if you're lucky! It's amazing how our brain works. There really is no green dot, and the pink ones really don't disappear. This should be proof enough, that we don't always see what we think we see.
Illusionism again !

The same thing is with processors, we don't always get we think we get.
SO, DOES INTEL'S POWER CONSUMPTION MISTERIOUSLY DIMINISH? WITH A LITTLE HELP OF THE FAMOUS SPECIAL HARDWARE DESIGNER DAVID COPPERFIELD? LETS CHECK.

So there are two TDPs... or, at least, there used to be, six years ago. Anyway, AMD's claim is that its 125 watt number represents the FX-62's TDPmax, and Intel's 75 watt number represents Core 2 Extreme's TDPtyp. If Intel represented the maximal TDP instead, the numbers might look much different.

How does Intel and AMD define TDP? ONLY AFTER THAT CONCLUDE YOURSELF, IS THE FUTURE OF INTEL'S NEW ARCHITECTURE GREEN AND/OR PINKY.

P.S. David Copperfield ( name taken after the Charles Dickens novel ) was quite possible special advisor for the famous Tejas design team. Oh, how that illusion has been convincing. I don't know anyone who could resist. Anyway, my favorite one ( however, let's see first how "the new architecture" illusion will advance, but many are already immersed in) . Intel itself gives us a hint after once noniventively called its new weapon Coppermine. Of course, David Copperfield was in 1999 Intel's secret weapon only for some future designs. P III itself was a quite decent processor I still use, but Intel was even then aware that hit the wall in the dead end Pentium street. So, David was its cheapest answer against the booming AMD.

HOW TO GET RID OFF all ILLUSIONS? THINK ABOUT THIS: SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH A NEW ARCHITECTURE ANNOUNCEMENT, INTEL FIRED 1000 MANAGERS , WHO HAVE HANDLED THE CREATION OF THAT NEW, "UNBEATABLE" ARCHITECTURE ! !. WHAT AN EXAMPLE OF "GRATITUDE". OR, THAT NEW ARCHITECTURE IS ONLY AN FRAUD, SO WHY SO MANY MANAGERS IN THE FUTURE TO CREATE ONLY MORE FRAUDS?
WHAT IS MORE NATURAL THAN THAT THOSE PEOPLE START WHISTLE BLOWING ?
OBVIOUSLY, NOT WITHOUT THE REASONS.

This post link
Comments:
at this moment i see no reason to call Merom, Conroe, and Woodcrest an illusion. they perform VERY well in the applications so far tested (a lot), and are cheaper than the AMD equivalant. Please explain your reasons for coming to this conclusing

GO K6-3!!!
 
Hey, Genius... The 1,ooo fired managers where not ALL associated with any one group or project. They were fired where there was excessive and redundant positions from first-line operations managers to executives and everyone one in between. Managers from Fabs, R&D, servers, microprocessors, sales, and support. Keep believing what you think... and know that you are wrong.

By the way... the 1,ooo managers fired is in addition to the nearly 7oo Human Resources people laid off in May. There wasn't much news about that on Tom's Hardware but I'd like to see you tie that one in. Additionally... you may want to add in the sale of the cell phone chips and technology to Marvel in June as there were nearly 1,6oo people that were sold with that unit.

In a nutshell... worldwide that's about 3,3oo people gone from a company of 1oo,ooo+ employees in just under 8 weeks. It is called streamlining... not hiding fraud. And if you think it is over, it probably isn't. I'd bet by September there's a call for another 2,6oo people.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?