BAD HARDWARE WEEK

Sadam's nuke disappeared again !
Finally, a truth on his bad hardware.
Yeah we know that story. It was simply "undoubtly" there, just a days before US attack in 2003.
Then, when Sadam fell it mysteriously disappear for the first time. No one could find it, nor even any trace about it , for the whole three years, until scandalized Republicans didn't need some public support for the latest elections.
Then, nuke bomb story simply appeared in Jewish owned NYT. I mean, distinguished newspapers couldn't find anything until quite recently, days before the elections???.
Then when publicity was enough intruiged, bomb simply dissapeared for the second time, this time for govenrment's web portal, because the topic was so "hot" that someone could make a nuke at home reading it. Thus, we are now completely convinced? Well not quite.

Last night ABC News reported on five recently declassified documents captured in Iraq.One of these was a handwritten account of a February 19, 1995, meeting between an official representative of Iraq and Mr. bin Laden himself, where Mr. bin Laden broached the idea of "carrying out joint operations against foreign forces" in Saudi Arabia. The document, which has no official stamps or markers, reports that when Saddam was informed of the meeting on March 4, 1995 he agreed to broadcast sermons of a radical imam, Suleiman al Ouda, requested by Mr. bin Laden.

What is the problem with this "finding"? Radical islamists don't use paper in their deals, but honest word after they swear by Good.Thus, pretty hard to find any trace.

However, US Intelligence find it!


You could find at Internet a guide for nuke making, for some 10 years. And no one bothered?
Sadam wouldn't come close in this technical detail, even if he was able to stay in power for hundreds years ( time frame Republicans planned to stay in power too).
Any suggestion? Laughable, what else.

Laughable even more. Distinguished NYT finds the following:
Some intelligence officials feared that individual documents, translated and interpreted by amateurs, would be used out of context to second-guess the intelligence agencies’ view that Mr. Hussein did not have unconventional weapons or substantive ties to terrorism. Reviewing the documents for release would add an unnecessary burden on busy intelligence analysts, they argued.

But , withdrawed government document Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to Terrorism and How They Compare With Prewar Assessments, finds:

"Saddam Hussein was distrustful of al-Qaeda and viewed Islamic
extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from
al-Qaeda to provide material or operational support"

Until the 2003 attack, Sadam was simply a US friend in the Near East. Just like a King of Saudi Arabia is still.
Thus, can we call this tragedy of one, once upon time distinuguished, newspapers simply: Republican's bullshits?. Making the fools of all of US.