Friday, October 26, 2007
Even with Nehalem, Intel is still a full year behind the AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11c4a/11c4a261465a638bd1c02a3fed347beef357959e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d07/f4d076fa91143e1993c460682aa6996a0d9ff221" alt=""
And what brings Nehalem? SSE4-2 with 7 new instructions. Higher clock? No, not at least initially. So, what are its advantages? Higher IPC? Hmmm ... no. I don't see anything special there, and I really don't understand all this lying hype on Nehalem. The only innovation there I see is introduction of new high K manufacturing technology that will slash its 45nm leakage to acceptable level (45nm 2 dies Yorkfield consumes 150W ) and consequently Nehalem's 8 core TDP to half of the Yorkfield 8 core analog.