Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Intel's Woodcrest launched !
Woodcrest ! Badhardware's favorit!
What to say on Intel's latest AMD me too technology? Yes? No ? But, it is an Apple DUAL CORE ! (TM). Hmmm, perhaps better sounds DUAL HOLE? Just imagine logo AMD 64 INSIDE in two apple holes above.What is actually the trouble INSIDE (TM)? Well, look at the left apple above, it is the picture of Woodcrest's performance when program references locality is maintained. But when L2 cache miss happen, better illustration of Woodcrest performance is that one apple on the right. Woodcrest has no integrated memory controller, but has instead of it congested and selfblocking processor bus. While that one Woodcrest microarchitecture is still app(l)ealing in desktop use, it is unbeatable sucker for intended multiuser competitive tasks, where cache misses are do(r)minant mode of system operation.
But don't listen me, I am only an passionate Intel hater. Woodcrest should be an brilliant X86 server architecture !?
If so, Intel should in a few days cancel Itanium as completely obsolete ? Right? But, what if it wouldn't be canceled?
Than I am not an ordinary Intel hater, but only humble, direct promoter of bad hardware worldwide. No polite phrases in stylish English HERE, HIDEN costs and troubles, mysterious flaws, hidden unpached bugs on misssion critical systems etc. , you every day search for help at all the others (commercials based !) hardware sites.
Just as Galileo would like to say:
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
This post link
Comments:
<< Home
Selfblocking processor bus?
Not with the bensley-plattform. Each of the two cpu
use a dedicated 10,5GB/s bus.
Integrated Memory Controller in AMD-chips? Stupid firmly lay of one sort of memory-type.
Post a Comment
Not with the bensley-plattform. Each of the two cpu
use a dedicated 10,5GB/s bus.
Integrated Memory Controller in AMD-chips? Stupid firmly lay of one sort of memory-type.
<< Home